PREFERENCES IN ONLINE LEARNING OF STS: PERSPECTIVES FROM STUDENTS
Keywords:
Creative teaching-learning, Online teaching-learning, Science Technology and Society, VAK TheoryAbstract
In today's higher education setting, the integration of online learning has profoundly transformed pedagogical practices, particularly in Science, Technology, and Society (STS) education. This study investigates students' preferences for online learning in the context of STS at a state university in the Philippines. Using a researcher-developed questionnaire focused on Modality, Assessment, Relevance, and Interaction (MARIQ), the research examines various aspects of online learning methods and assessment practices. The study reveals that students prefer asynchronous learning modes and multimedia-rich content to enhance engagement and comprehension. These insights are vital for shaping curriculum design and instructional strategies, with an emphasis on the need for adaptable assessment methods and interactive learning platforms. Additionally, the study addresses challenges such as maintaining student engagement and improving technological competencies. It suggests potential areas for future research in adaptive technologies and innovative teaching approaches to further enhance STS education.
References
Araiza-Alba, P., Keane, T., Chen, W. S., & Kaufman, J. (2021). Immersive virtual reality as a tool to learn problem-solving skills. Computers & Education, 164, 104121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104121
Berisha, F., & Vula, E. (2024). Introduction of integrated STEM education to pre-service teachers through collaborative action research practices. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 22(5), 1127-1150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10417-3
Bolden, B., DeLuca, C., Kukkonen, T., Roy, S., & Wearing, J. (2020). Assessment of creativity in K‐12 education: A scoping review. Review of education, 8(2), 343-376. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3188
Bowden, J. L. H., Tickle, L., & Naumann, K. (2021). The four pillars of tertiary student engagement and success: a holistic measurement approach. Studies in Higher Education, 46(6), 1207-1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1672647
Cavicchi, E. (2024). Curiosity Opens Relationships of the World and with Others: Narratives from Doing Teaching and Learning Through Curiosity. Interchange, 1-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10780-024-09529-8
Crome, J., & Saltmarsh, S. (2023). Picturing policy: Visual representations of curriculum policy in Australia, Hong Kong and Singapore. In Childhood, learning & everyday life in three Asia-Pacific cities: Experiences from Melbourne, Hong Kong and Singapore (pp. 61-79). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0486-0_4
Ehtıyar, R., & Baser, G. (2019). University education and creativity: An assessment from students’ perspective. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 19(80), 113-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2019.80.6
García-Morales, V. J., Garrido-Moreno, A., & Martín-Rojas, R. (2021). The transformation of higher education after the COVID disruption: Emerging challenges in an online learning scenario. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 616059. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.616059
Haim, K., & Aschauer, W. (2024). Innovative FOCUS: A Program to Foster Creativity and Innovation in the Context of Education for Sustainability. Sustainability, 16(6), 2257. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062257
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable operations and computers, 3, 275-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
Hamzah, F., Abdullah, A. H., & Ma, W. (2024). Advancing Education through Technology Integration, Innovative Pedagogies and Emerging Trends: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 41(1), 44-63. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.41.1.4463
Jaleniauskiene, E., & Kasperiuniene, J. (2023). Infographics in higher education: A scoping review. E-learning and Digital Media, 20(2), 191-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530221107774
Marley, S. A., Siani, A., & Sims, S. (2022). Real‐life research projects improve student engagement and provide reliable data for academics. Ecology and Evolution, 12(12), e9593. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9593
Mian, S. H., Salah, B., Ameen, W., Moiduddin, K., & Alkhalefah, H. (2020). Adapting universities for sustainability education in industry 4.0: Channel of challenges and opportunities. Sustainability, 12(15), 6100. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156100
Minh, N. T. T. (2024). Teacher Professional Development in Education 5.0. In Preconceptions of Policies, Strategies, and Challenges in Education 5.0 (pp. 175-204). IGI Global.
Moldez, J. (2024). Level of Convenience to Teachers, Acceptability and Challenges Experienced by the Learners on Hy Flex (Hybrid and Flexible) Learning Modality. Educational Research (IJMCER), 6(3), 784-820. https://www.ijmcer.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/IJMCER_LL0630784820.pdf
Nykyporets, S. S., Melnyk, O. D., Ibrahimova, L. V., Hadaichuk, N. M., & Derun, V. H. (2024). Advancing critical thinking skills among higher education students through English language instruction: contemporary approaches and strategies. Prospects and innovations of science. № 1 (35): 34-45. https://conferences.vntu.edu.ua/index.php/all-fbtegp/all-fbtegp-2024/paper/viewFile/20698/17096
Neuwirth, Lorenz S., Svetlana Jović, and B. Runi Mukherji. "Reimagining higher education during and post-COVID-19: Challenges and opportunities." Journal of Adult and Continuing Education 27, no. 2 (2021): 141-156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477971420947738
Pérez, P. G., & Galván, J. J. M. (2023). Development of a formative sequence for prospective science teachers: The challenge of improving teaching with analogies through the integration of infographics and augmented reality. JOTSE, 13(1), 159-177. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1919
Rotar, O. (2022). Online student support: A framework for embedding support interventions into the online learning cycle. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 17(1), 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41039-021-00178-4
Santana, A. L. M., & de Deus Lopes, R. (2024). Using Real-World Problems and Project-Based Learning for Future Skill Development: An Approach to Connect Higher Education Students and Society Through User-Centered Design. In Creating the University of the Future: A Global View on Future Skills and Future Higher Education (pp. 393-417). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-42948-5_20
Singha, S. (2024). Promoting Diversity and Inclusivity Through Service Learning in Higher Education. In Applications of Service Learning in Higher Education (pp. 20-34). IGI Global. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2133-1.ch002
Suyuti, S. (2024). The Importance of Creativity and Innovation in Education: How to Prepare Students for the 21st Century Workforce. Education Studies and Teaching Journal (EDUTECH), 1(1), 80-92. https://doi.org/10.62207/29g1vq26
Uyanne, E. O. (2024). Exploring the Psychological Impact of Social Exclusion and Isolation Among Upper Basic Students in Kwara State. Journal of Pedagogy, Andragogy and Heutagogy in Academic Practice, 5(1), 106-120. https://uonjournals.uonbi.ac.ke/ojs/index.php/pedagogy/article/view/2182
Williams, Z. (2024). Addressing Diverse Learners' Needs Through Inclusivity. In Utilizing Virtual Communities in Professional Practice (pp. 117-139). IGI Global.
Wylie, E. C., & Lyon, C. J. (2019). The role of technology-enhanced self-and peer assessment in formative assessment. In Classroom assessment and educational measurement (pp. 170-191). Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429507533-10
Zhao, D., Playfoot, J., De Nicola, C., Guarino, G., Bratu, M., Di Salvadore, F., & Muntean, G. M. (2021). An innovative multi-layer gamification framework for improved STEM learning experience. IEEE Access, 10, 3879-3889. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3139729
.png)
